Sunday, August 8, 2010

Thoughts on "Sixth Column"...

The “Sixth Column” is one of Robert Heinlein’s first published novels. It was written in 1941 and supposed that the Asians got the atomic bomb and the “vortex beam” and won the war. I think Japan had taken over India and China before invading America so they are referred to PanAsians in the book. We see very little of them in the novel, so they never become anything more than a caricature of Japanese culture. All we learn about them is that they speak in a formal and flowery language and at the slightest dishonor, they commit suicide rather than disgrace their families. They are cruel rulers; thousands of Americans are put to death in retaliation for some rebels capturing one of the PanAsian governors.

People have said that this caricature is racist and it is! However, it is no worse then when aliens are presented as one-dimensionally evil invaders in any number of science fiction novels. But all of us know Japanese culture and Japanese people so we know what a one-sided portrayal this is. Where as when it’s invaders from Mars we just think, “Oh, those Martians are just so evil.”

And it is no different than what governments did historically to demonize the enemy in times of war. The US government demonized the Germans during WWI by portraying them as dark, evil Huns and also demonized the German people and the Japanese during WWII. That’s just what all countries did. It’s only modern technology that has made this kind of thing more difficult today. I mean the average American wants all the terrorists dead today, but at least they don’t want the Afghan people dead. That’s progress!

This book only acknowledges two races Asians and Caucasians; I don’t know what happened to all the other races. African Americans, Native Americans, Middle Eastern Americans just aren’t mentioned at all. As I’ll go in to more detail later the American forces come up with super weapons that can be programmed to only affect PanAsians.

Another unspeakably horrible happening in “Sixth Column” is the PanAsians committing genocide on all the Asian Americans. You see, the PanAsians want to be the master race and want all Americans to be a slave race. It was just too complicated to them that Asian Americans would look like the masters but still be slaves so they just started getting rid of them. It’s not the same, but Americans did round up Japanese Americas during WWII and put them into civilian internment camps (a nice way to say prison camps) because, “they couldn’t be trusted.” A lot better than mass murder, but still awful.

The first chapter of the novel is really excellent, it is really rich story and idea wise: The PanAsians invade Washington and New York City and other major cities and completely take over America in one day. Deep within one of the Rocky Mountains, there is a secret American military base devoted to scientific research called “The Citadel.” On the same day as the invasion, the bases’ most brilliant scientist Ledbetter had an unexpected major scientific breakthrough. Unfortunately the breakthrough resulted in not only his own death, but also the death of all but 6 members of the Citadel.

Also that same day, Major Whitey Ardmore, an intelligence officer from Washington arrives at the Citadel to see how operations there are progressing. He was sent before the invasion. When he left Washington, their hope was that some weapons would be developed soon, before the PanAsians decided to attack. Unfortunately, minutes after his arrival at the Citadel they listen to radio reports of the destruction of American cities. Ardmore has no choice, but to assume that the Citadel might be the last hope for America defeating the PanAsains and that they are on their own.

Ardmore first has the 6 men introduce themselves, there are 3 scientists, a mathematician, a biologist/bio-chemist, and a radiologist/physicist, a craftsman, a cook, and a cook’s assistant.

The first job in the Citadel after Ardmore gives the group a pep talk is to clean up the hundreds of dead bodies in the base from the experiment gone wrong.

Ardmore who immediately assumes command of this group is himself not a military man, he was an advertising man and became a sort of PR man in Washington. It is interesting to see a man that has never fought a war learning how to lead and how to win against impossible odds.

The breakthrough that Ledbetter had concerned the discovery of additional spectra; I’ll let Dr. Lowell Calhoun explain it, “You see, most of the progress in physics in the last century and a half has been in dealing with the electromagnetic spectrum of light, radio, X-Ray…General field theory predicts the possibility of at least three more entire spectra. You see, there are three types of energy fields known to exist in space: electric, magnetic, and gravitic or gravitational. Light, X-rays, all such radiations, are part of the electromagnetic spectrum. Theory indicates the possibility of analogous spectra between magnetic and gravitic, between electric and gravitic, and, finally , a three-phase type between electric-magnetic-gravitic fields. Each type would constitute a complete new spectrum, a total of three new fields of learning. If there are such, they would presumably have properties quite as remarkable as the electromagnetic spectrum and quite different.” (p.20-21 in Hardcover Edition)

Ledbetter it seems had found a way to tap into these other spectrums, unfortunately for him and most of the other people in the Citadel the wave he tapped into is one that is deadly to humans. Calhoun and the others figure out a way to adapt the beam. They can make anyone the beam hits unconscious or dead. They even figured out a way to make it only do so for PanAsians and not Caucasians.

They also tapped into a number of different spectra, they found a communications channel so they had radio and video that could not be traced. They had a spectrum that could be adapted into a personal shield that could deflect most conventional weapons including guns. They found a gravitational spectrum that could be used to lift heavy objects. They found a spectrum of transmutation so they could make endless supplies of gold or turn solid rock into a harmless gas. They also found a spectrum that healed people of all diseases.

Yes, it is extremely unbelievable that 7 people managed to come up with so many technological advances so quickly, but it makes sense that if you tapped into what is basically a new science you might make a bunch of different advances fairly quickly.

So now Ardmore has some superior technology, but it is still just seven men against an empire and he has already seen that as active guerilla warfare on his part would be paid for a thousand times over by innocent Americans. So he has to resort to the strange tactic of starting a new religion. You see the PanAsians still allow freedom of religion oddly enough, because they say “all a slave needs is food, rest and religion and if you give them religion you can deny them the other two sometimes.”

The Citadel quickly spreads their religion around the country and by the time the PanAsians catch on, the Americans are ready to strike.

I enjoyed the book despite its flaws, but I can see why people are offended by the one- dimensional demonizing of Asians and/or think the scientific advances are too convenient.

6 comments:

  1. Great review, John. Note that the book was also published under the title, "The Day After Tomorrow." In fact, that's the title of my paperback copy.

    It's been a long time since I read it, but I should point out that modern standards of racism are considerably different from those of 1941. It's quite possible that the author didn't think he was being racist at all. (Wasn't one of the heroes of the story a Japanese-American?)

    Furthermore, if Japan had won the war, presumably the militarists would still be in charge. They did commit acts of great cruelty, and dishonor frequently required suicide. You can't compare Japanese culture today with that of World War II. What you call a caricature might be simply the projection of that militaristic culture of the time (sort of like writing science fiction during the McCarthy era in America that showed that kind of paranoia projected into the future).

    But I do remember cringing a few times when I read the book (years ago). Well, 1941 wasn't exactly an enlightened time with regard to racial matters.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Bill, glad you enjoyed the review. I should have mentioned the alternate title, thanks.

    You are also correct there is a Japanese American character in the novel. His family is killed by the PanAsians and he works with the members of the Citadel and sacrifices his life to protect others at the story's climax.

    But where as Asian Americans are shown to be complete human beings, the PanAsians are portrayed as one-sided. I think it was definitely racist. It just seemed like in order to make the story work the PanAsians were taken to a place of parody. They would commit suicide over the slightest offense and gave the religion far too much leeway for too long. They just end up seeming dumb, you wonder how they got as far militarily as they did. But you are right, I may be looking at it through modern lenses.

    If a story was written today about Middle Eastern terrorists taking over America, would it be considered racist to portray them all as evil to the core? My guess is that it wouldn't be, but it is an interesting moral question and historically people may think differently 20 or 50 years down the road.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Really, John, it's been too long since I've read the book for me to be sure about any of it. But is this the book where the Asian enemy is hopelessly superstitious, and therefore easily scared?

    That sort of thing really is parody and really is racist. I didn't mean to be defending the book. The fact is, I don't remember it well enough to do that. And as I said, I do remember cringing at some of the stuff in it.

    Regarding Middle Eastern terrorists, they're wrong, but are they evil? I'm sure they think they're doing the right thing, what their god wants them to do. And many of them are willing to give up their own lives in the process.

    I guess I would say that they do evil deeds, but that doesn't necessarily make them evil, and certainly not "evil to the core." More evil is done by people trying to do good than by people trying to do evil, wouldn't you agree?

    What WOULD be racist would be to portray all Middle Easterners as fanatic terrorists. People are individuals. When you see any group as monolithic, that's racist (or bigoted in some way, at least). If a subset of that group does terrible things, it's not bigoted to consider the subset evil (assuming that ALL of them are doing those terrible things, or at least supporting such deeds).

    ReplyDelete
  4. Regarding terrorists. Their actions are evil whether or not they think they are going to be glorified by Allah doesn't enter into it.

    They are certainly not what I would call good people. At the very least they believe that who they are and their beliefs make them bettter and more important than other people to the point where it is all right to kill as many unbelievers as possible. I think killing innocent people is evil. Therefore their actions make them evil.

    You are right that more evil is done by people trying to do good. History is full of such stories. And the lesson I draw from history is that you should not try to better yourself at the expense of innocent people's lives.

    Yes, it would be racist to portray all Middle Easterners as terrorists. Which is why I made that exact point in my blog.

    ReplyDelete
  5. In the new biography on Heinlein, it says Heinlein wrote Sixth Column based on a story by John W. Campbell that he couldn't sell, and that Heinlein had to work hard to remove Campbell's more extreme racism. Heinlein was very liberal at this time, and the biography pointed out in several places where Heinlein supported Asians, African Americans and Jews when people around him was attacking them. Heinlein ever wrote off friendships over prejudice. Where Heinlein was intolerant was his feelings about America. Patterson, his biography, suggests, that America was Heinlein's religion, and even presented a letter where Heinlein said as much. When it came to America, Heinlein was all black and white.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Like you I certainly saw some elements in the story that could be construed as racism and how one feels about it probably comes largely from interpretation of motive and willingness to see it as a product of the time it was written. As I said in my review I found the whole novel incredibly fascinating given that it was published mere months before the Japanese invaded Pearl Harbor, making the idea of a PanAsian invasion (say that three times real fast!) a palpable reality. I cannot imagine what it would have been like on Dec. 7th if I was alive then and had just read these three issues of Astounding. I think it would have freaked me out a bit.

    The PanAsians are definitely presented as one sided but I don't find that racist so much as I do a natural reaction to a country that was a potential threat at the time. I do think, as Jim points out, there are several examples where Heinlein makes an effort to show the reader that he doesn't have a black and white view of the races. I'm not sure what happened to all the non-white Americans but I think this was more of a storytelling device to make it easier for the PanAsians to slander Americans as "whiteys" vs. the American slanders of "yellow" present in the book. He also has women getting involved, albeit in small roles, in the story which was somewhat forward thinking for the time period.

    Heinlein was a complicated man, in my opinion, although I suspect we all are when it comes right down to it.

    Despite its flaws I found the book to be a fantastic page-turner.

    ReplyDelete